Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1377

reference
972-tree-1
name
1377
tree-preservation-order

undefined

972-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.008954 50.855955)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.008869 50.855945,-1.008873 50.855962,-1.008885 50.855977,-1.008903 50.855989,-1.008927 50.855997,-1.008953 50.856000,-1.008980 50.855998,-1.009003 50.855990,-1.009023 50.855979,-1.009035 50.855964,-1.009040 50.855947,-1.009036 50.855930,-1.009024 50.855915,-1.009005 50.855903,-1.008982 50.855895,-1.008955 50.855892,-1.008929 50.855895,-1.008905 50.855902,-1.008886 50.855914,-1.008874 50.855929,-1.008869 50.855945)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL